The Kerekes v. Polyak litigation in Morris County Superior Court has reached a critical juncture, with defendant Samuel (Sam) Polyak now facing major sanctions for allegedly disregarding a court order requiring the return of parts belonging to 90-year-old Robert Kerekes’ 2003 Acura NSX. This latest development adds significant legal pressure amid ongoing allegations of elder financial exploitation, a botched EV conversion, and withheld vehicle components.

Robert Kerekes, a stroke survivor and longtime car collector, originally contracted with Sam Polyak of Polykup Inc. for a premium Tesla battery electric vehicle conversion on his prized Acura NSX. According to court filings and advocacy reports, the project allegedly went awry due to safety issues, the substitution of salvaged Chevrolet Bolt batteries (known for fire risks and recalls), cost overruns, and the disappearance of numerous high-value original components, including the engine, transmission, and other factory parts. Despite demands and court directives, many of these parts have reportedly not been returned.

Court-Ordered Return and Alleged Non-Compliance

The court is said to have issued an order directing Polyak to return the missing Acura NSX parts. Advocates claim that Polyak’s failure to comply with this directive has prompted motions for substantial sanctions. These sanctions could include monetary penalties, adverse inferences in the case, striking of defenses, or other measures to enforce compliance and compensate for delays and alleged harm to the elderly plaintiff.

This development compounds existing legal challenges in the case. Associate David (Dave) Gutwill of Ultimate Car Care in Fair Lawn, NJ — where the vehicle was reportedly transferred — is already facing contempt of court proceedings for allegedly refusing to appear at a court-mandated deposition.

Family Involvement and Potential Testimony

Concerns continue to grow regarding potential broader family involvement. Advocates have raised questions about whether Eduard Polyak and Isabella Polyak (Sam’s parents) could be named as additional defendants due to possible ties to the operations, funds, or handling of the disputed assets. While no formal amendment has been confirmed as of June 2026, plaintiff’s counsel appears focused on mapping all connections in the chain of custody.

Additionally, while no allegations of wrongdoing have been made against Sam Polyak’s sister, Marina Polyak — who has professional experience in elder affairs — she may be asked to testify. Her background could shed light on family communications or awareness surrounding the transaction with the vulnerable senior plaintiff.

Sustained Protests by NJ Auto Owners Association

The New Jersey Auto Owners Association (NJAOA) has continued its persistent protests at locations linked to Polyak, Gutwill, and associated addresses. Demonstrators demand the full return of the Acura NSX, all missing parts, and accountability, often highlighting the impact on the 90-year-old victim with signs addressing alleged withholding and elder exploitation. These actions have maintained strong public pressure on the parties involved.

Broader Implications

The Elder Help Network’s amicus brief underscores the importance of protecting elderly consumers in high-value vehicle modification projects and urges the court to take decisive action. If sanctions are imposed on Sam Polyak, it could strengthen the plaintiff’s position and serve as a deterrent in similar consumer disputes.

The case remains pending before Civil Presiding Judge Frank DeAngelis. All allegations by the plaintiff and supporting advocates have not been fully adjudicated, and the defendants have the opportunity to respond and present their defense. As proceedings advance, the focus remains on compelling the return of Kerekes’ property and resolving the dispute in a manner that upholds consumer protections and elder safeguards under New Jersey law.

This high-profile matter continues to highlight challenges in the EV conversion and classic car service sectors, particularly when vulnerable seniors entrust valuable assets to service providers. Further updates are anticipated as the court addresses the motions for sanctions and any potential expansion of the defendant list.