Miscellaneous
Previously, David has explained the history of the doctrine of stare decisis that is now used to uphold Roe v. Wade. Today he takes a 2019 opinion of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in which he said stare decisis “does not comport with our judicial duty under Article III” and explains how it is used to provide cover for a “living constitution” the Court can manipulate. Support the show: https://www.factennessee.org/donate See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.