About

Cryogenic Pipe Support Systems on Membrane LNG Carriers

Introduction and Context

The global energy transition has elevated Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to a pivotal role, driving the expansion of maritime transport infrastructure. Membrane-type LNG carriers, which transport LNG at approximately -162°C, are central to this infrastructure. The operational reliability and safety of these vessels are heavily dependent on the meticulous design and maintenance of their cryogenic piping systems and, critically, their associated supports.

As highlighted in the source, cryogenic pipe supports are "not merely structural components; they represent a critical interface between extremely low-temperature cargo systems and the ambient hull structure, demanding specialized engineering to manage thermal contraction, dynamic vessel motions, and fire safety protocols." Failure in these supports can lead to severe consequences, including "compromised insulation, structural fatigue, or, in severe instances, breaches of the cargo containment system, posing substantial safety and economic risks."

This briefing document synthesizes key themes from the provided source, focusing on the unique challenges, failure mechanisms, and best practices pertinent to cryogenic pipe supports on membrane LNG carriers, particularly those employing GTT Mark III containment systems.

Main Themes and Most Important Ideas/Facts

1. Unique Challenges of Membrane LNG Carrier Architecture for Pipe Supports

Membrane LNG carriers (GTT NO96, Mark III) present distinct design challenges for pipe supports compared to Moss-type (spherical) carriers due to their sensitive cargo containment systems:

• Sensitive Containment System: Membrane systems feature thin metallic membranes (Invar or corrugated stainless steel) backed by complex insulation (plywood, polyurethane foam boxes, or perlite-filled plywood boxes). This system is "inherently sensitive to localized loads and thermal anomalies."
• Avoidance of "Hard Spots": Pipe support foundations must be meticulously designed to avoid creating "hard spots" or cold bridges that could compromise the containment integrity. This requires load-spreading baseplates and chocks to "distribute loads evenly, and localized point loads transmitted through the deck can compromise their structural integrity or create thermal short circuits."
• Hull Flexibility: The "unique structural behavior of these vessels, characterized by significant hull girder flexibility and localized deck deflections during seaway operations," further complicates support design by inducing cyclic loads on foundations.
• Critical Interfaces: Tank domes, deck penetrations, and machinery connections are highly sensitive areas. Supports in these zones must "account for the limited allowable loads and moments on sensitive nozzles" and ensure pipe movements do not impose excessive stresses. "Proper sealing and vapor barrier continuity are paramount at these interfaces."

2. Cryogenic Piping Systems and Specific Support Requirements

The various piping systems on LNG carriers each have unique support considerations:

• Cargo Vapor Headers & Crossovers: These large-diameter lines experience significant thermal contraction (-162°C) and require "robust support systems that permit controlled movement while restraining the pipe against vessel motions." Sliding supports with low-friction materials are common.
• Dome Piping (Spray, Stripping, ESD Lines): These intricate lines directly interface with sensitive tank domes. Supports must "accommodate movements without transmitting excessive forces or moments to the dome nozzles." Anchor and guide placement is critical to direct thermal expansion away from these sensitive zones, especially during rapid thermal transients of ESD events.
• Nitrogen Purge & Interbarrier Space Piping: These lines must be "gastight and designed to withstand the low temperatures of any leaked LNG vapor" and supported without compromising barrier integrity. Inspection of interbarrier lines is challenging due to limited access.
• Fuel Gas Supply Systems (FGSS): For dual-fuel vessels, FGSS piping requires supports that manage thermal contraction, accommodate ship motions, and ensure integrity at connections to vibration-prone machinery. "Fire safety and hazardous area compliance are paramount."

3. Regulatory Frameworks and Technical Guidance

A multi-layered regulatory environment governs the design of these critical components:

• Classification Society Rules (ABS, DNV): These societies establish comprehensive rules (derived from IGC Code, IGF Code) for design, construction, and survey. They "mandate the consideration of ship motion envelopes (longitudinal, transverse, and vertical accelerations) and prescribe factors for combining these loads with sustained and thermal loads." They also cover material selection and NDE.
• GTT Outfitting Guidelines: As the licensor for membrane systems, GTT issues detailed guidelines that are "crucial for pipe support design." These specify "prohibited zones for drilling and welding on the tank deck, minimum stand-off distances from dome coamings, and allowable deck bearing/contact pressures." Adherence prevents compromise to the primary and secondary barriers.
• Piping Standards (ASME B31.3, EN 13480): These industrial codes are applied for pressure piping design, covering "stress analysis, material selection, fabrication, inspection, and testing." Vendor data for specialized components like cryogenic shoes is essential.

4. Core Design Strategies for Reliability

Effective design strategies are crucial to manage the complex interplay of loads and environmental conditions:

• Load Distribution and Structural Integrity: Foundations must be "robust enough to withstand these dynamic loads without fatigue cracking." "Foundation Sizing: Avoidance of Hard Spots and Load Concentration" is critical to prevent overstressing the deck plating or insulation, often requiring "large, reinforced baseplates."
• Thermal Isolation and Cold Bridge Prevention:Cryogenic Shoe Materials: Insulation blocks (polyurethane foam, phenolic, cellular glass) must exhibit "high compressive strength and low creep under sustained and dynamic loads at these extreme temperatures." Vendor test data at -170°C is essential.
• Vapor Barrier Continuity: Maintaining the continuity of the vapor barrier around supports is "paramount to prevent moisture ingress into the insulation system," which can lead to ice formation, ice jacking, and corrosion. Thermal break pads and proper sealing are vital.
• Piping Movement Control:Anchors & Guides: Anchors fix the pipe, directing thermal expansion to expansion loops or sliding supports. Guides permit movement in specific directions. Their placement is "strategically important, particularly in relation to sensitive interfaces like tank domes and machinery nozzles."
• Friction Management: Sliding supports utilize PTFE slide plates for low friction. "Realistic friction coefficients (e.g., 0.06–0.12 for dry PTFE/SS) are used in stress analysis, but sensitivity studies considering a range of friction values (e.g., up to 0.2 for degraded conditions) are necessary." "Pipe walk" must be predicted and mitigated.
• Material Selection and Corrosion Prevention:Austenitic Stainless Steel: Preferred for cryogenic zones due to "excellent mechanical properties and ductility at extremely low temperatures" and corrosion resistance.
• Dissimilar Metal Isolation: Non-absorbing shims and sleeves (e.g., neoprene, PTFE) are used to prevent galvanic corrosion between dissimilar metals. Marine coatings protect carbon steel foundations.
• Integration with Insulation Systems: "Insulation Block Specification: Compressive Strength and Creep at Cryogenic Temperatures" is vital. "Moisture Control, Drainage Design, and Drip Shield Implementation" prevent water accumulation and ice formation.
• Fire Safety and Hazardous Area Compliance: Supports in hazardous areas must "maintain their structural integrity in fire scenarios for a specified duration." Materials must have low flame spread.

5. Common Failure Mechanisms and Risks

Real-world experience highlights specific failure modes unique to membrane LNG carriers:

• Cold Bridge-Induced Secondary Barrier Breaches: If thermal isolation is compromised, "a cold spot can develop on the deck plate above the secondary barrier," potentially leading to "embrittlement and cracking...or even localized damage to the secondary barrier itself due to thermal stress or ice formation."
• PIR Block Crushing: "PIR blocks in cold shoes on the trunk deck crushed under dynamic loads, particularly during heavy weather." This results from underestimation of ship accelerations and leads to thermal short circuits and vapor barrier damage.
• Guide Friction Variability: Wear or contamination of PTFE plates can increase friction, causing a guide to act as an anchor, which "can impose excessive loads and moments on sensitive components, such as tank dome nozzles."
• Moisture Ingress, Ice Jacking, and Insulation Displacement: "When water enters the insulation system and freezes, it expands, causing 'ice jacking' – a mechanical force that can misalign supports, displace insulation, or damage piping."
• Foundation Weld Fatigue: Cyclic stresses from hull girder deflection can cause "weld cracks...at stress concentration points."
• Commissioning Errors (Locked Spring Hangers): Spring hangers left locked during cooldown prevent free thermal contraction, leading to "severe thermal overload events, causing high stresses in the piping, potentially resulting in deformation, cracks, or even a seep at a socket weld during the first cooldown."

6. Systemic Impact of Regulatory Compliance on Design Optimization

Harmonizing various regulatory requirements is a complex but essential task:

• Challenges in Harmonizing ABS/DNV Rules with GTT Guidelines: "Challenges arise when these requirements, while generally complementary, present conflicts or ambiguities in specific design applications." This necessitates "a highly integrated design process, often involving close coordination between shipyard, pipe support vendors, and GTT."
• Consequences of Incomplete Application of Class Society Requirements: "Incomplete application of class society requirements during design or construction can lead to significant operational risks and failures." Examples include under-sizing insulation blocks, neglecting fatigue analysis, or failing to account for foundation flexibility, all of which "can compromise the structural integrity...and incur costly repairs or off-hire periods."

Recommendations for Risk Mitigation, Inspection, and Lifecycle Management

The source provides a comprehensive list of recommendations across the lifecycle:

• Pre-Design Phase:Rigorously apply class-approved motion coefficients.
• Obtain and adhere to GTT-approved drawings for prohibited zones and load limits.
• Strategically locate anchors away from domes.
• Define precise friction factors and clamp torques.
• Select vendors with comprehensive cryo-test data for insulation blocks.
• Detailed Design Phase:Execute pipe stress models with foundation flexibility and full ship motion envelopes.
• Detail thermal breaks, vapor barrier terminations, drip shields, and drainage.
• Specify load-spreading baseplates and comprehensive NDE/coating details.
• Ensure adequate access for future inspection.
• Installation and Commissioning Phase:Implement stringent QC for alignment, shims, torque, PTFE, and weld NDE.
• Protect insulation and ensure vapor barrier continuity tests.
• Implement clear lock-out/tag-out for spring hangers, ensuring pins are removed.
• Conduct controlled cooldowns with IR thermal surveys and re-check settings after first thermal cycle and heavy weather.
• In-Service Operations:Institute regular walkdowns for icing, wear, loose fasteners, or damage.
• Promptly investigate unusual cold spots.
• Proactively replace worn PTFE liners.
• Re-verify settings after drydock or heavy weather.

Future Directions

Future advancements are expected in:

• Advanced Materials: Materials with even lower thermal conductivities and enhanced mechanical properties (e.g., composites).
• Smart Materials/Integrated Sensors: Real-time monitoring of temperature, stress, and movement.
• Additive Manufacturing: Optimized support geometries for weight reduction and improved performance.
• Regulatory Harmonization: More prescriptive requirements for fatigue analysis and friction ranges.
• Digital Twin Technologies: Predictive maintenance and accurate simulation of operational stressors.

This holistic approach, from design to operations and future innovation, is essential for ensuring the long-term reliability and safety of cryogenic pipe support systems on membrane LNG carriers.

(1)Lisowski, F.; Lisowski, E. Thermal and Mechanical Analysis of the Internal Support for LNG Cryogenic Road Tanker. E3S Web of Conferences, 2019, 128, 01020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912801020.

(2)Rajole, S.; Sondar, P. R.; Hiremath, S.; Ravishankar, K. S. Failure Analysis of Industrial Discharge Hopper Pipe. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 2020, 5, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v5i1.5149.

(3)Pelto, P. J.; Ames, K. R.; Gallucci, R. H. Reliability Analysis of Containment Isolation Systems; Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1985. https://doi.org/10.2172/5535425.

(4)Sohn, J. M.; Bae, D. M.; Bae, S. Y.; Paik, J. K. Nonlinear Structural Behaviour of Membrane-Type LNG Carrier Cargo Containment Systems under Impact Pressure Loads at −163 °C. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2016, 12, 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2016.1218111.

(5)Kim, M.-S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.-K.; Lee, J.-M. Experimental Investigation of Structural Response of Corrugated Steel Sheet Subjected to Repeated Impact Loading: Performance of LNG Cargo Containment System. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9, 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081558.

(6)Sanavandi, H.; Bao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Keijzer, R.; Guo, W.; Cattafesta, L. N. A Cryogenic-Helium Pipe Flow Facility with Unique Double-Line Molecular Tagging Velocimetry Capability. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2020, 91. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008117.

(7)Effect of Over-Pressure on Pipeline Structural Integrity. Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette, 2019, 26. https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20180708213323.

(8)Yamaguchi, S.; Kanda, M.; Ivanov, Y. Heat Leak of Cryogenic Pipe for Superconducting Dc Power Transmission Line (SCDC). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, 1590, 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1590/1/012055.

(9)Guan, G.; Lin, Y.; Chen, Y. An Optimisation Design Method for Cryogenic Pipe Support Layout of LNG-Powered Ships. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 2017, 16, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2016.1276389.

(10)SELECTION OF CRYOGENIC INSULATION FOR LNG TRANSFER LINE. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 2015, 2. https://doi.org/10.21090/ijaerd.02023.

(11)Kim, J.-H.; Choi, S.-W.; Park, D.-H.; Lee, J.-M. Cryogenic Charpy Impact Test Based on GTAW Method of AISI 304 Stainless Steel for LNG Pipeline. Journal of Welding and Joining, 2014, 32, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.5781/jwj.2014.32.3.89.

(12)Chorowski, M.; Fydrych, J.; Grabowski, M.; Serio, L. Risk Analysis of the ITER Cryogenic System. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012, 1559–1566. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4707086.

(13)Naes, L.; Lloyd, B.; Schick, S.; Weisend, J. G.; Barclay, J.; Breon, S.; Demko, J.; DiPirro, M.; Kelley, J. P.; Kittel, P.; Klebaner, A.; Zeller, A.; Zagarola, M.; Van Sciver, S.; Rowe, A.; Pfotenhauer, J.; Peterson, T.; Lock, J. WISE CRYOGENIC SUPPORT SYSTEM DESIGN OVERVIEW AND BUILD STATUS. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2008, 985, 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2908675.

(14)Edeskuty, F.; Liebenberg, D.; Novak, J. PROBLEMS IN THE OPERATION OF LARGE CRYOGENIC SYSTEMS; Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1963. https://doi.org/10.2172/4697655.

(15)Structural Integrity Assessment of Welded Pipeline Designed with Reduced Safety. Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette, 2020, 27. https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20200413142538.

(16)Gupta, N. K. Structural Integrity Analysis of Process Water System Bingham Pumps; Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1992. https://doi.org/10.2172/6587923.

(17)Poncet, A.; Struik, M.; Trigo, J.; Parma, V.; Balachandran, U. (Balu); Amm, K.; Evans, D.; Gregory, E.; Lee, P.; Osofsky, M.; Pamidi, S.; Park, C.; Wu, J.; Sumption, M. THE LHC CRYOMAGNET SUPPORTS IN GLASS-FIBER REINFORCED EPOXY: A LARGE SCALE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION WITH HIGH REPRODUCIBILITY IN PERFORMANCE. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2008, 986, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2900348.

(18)Li, Y.; Fu, G.; Wan, B.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, W.; Yan, X. Failure Analysis of SAC305 Ball Grid Array Solder Joint at Extremely Cryogenic Temperature. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10, 1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10061951.

(19)NISHIMURA, A.; IMAGAWA, S.; TAMURA, H. Superconducting System for the Large Helical Device. Cryogenic Structural Material and Design of Support Structures for the Large Helical Device. TEION KOGAKU (Journal of Cryogenics and Superconductivity Society of Japan), 1997, 32, 586–595. https://doi.org/10.2221/jcsj.32.586.

(20)Cerbin, J.; Sochnikov, I. Isolation Solution for Extreme Environmental Vibrations for Quantum-Enabling Cryogenic Setups Installed on Raised Frames. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2019, 90. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5112088.

(21)Chmelko, V.; Garan, M.; Šulko, M.; Gašparík, M. Health and Structural Integrity of Monitoring Systems: The Case Study of Pressurized Pipelines. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10, 6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176023.